Back to Tutorials

Load Balancing & Scaling

Horizontal and vertical scaling strategies, load balancing algorithms, and auto-scaling patterns

80 minutes
8Detailed Sections
Senior Level

Vertical scaling: add CPU, memory, or disk to a single machine. Pros: simpler operationally, shared memory for coordination.

Cons: limited by hardware, single point of failure, larger capital expense upfront. Horizontal scaling: add more machines.

Pros: nearly unlimited scalability, fault tolerance, incremental cost. Cons: distributed systems complexity, eventual consistency, coordination overhead.

Modern cloud architecture favors horizontal because it is more resilient and cost-effective. Netflix and Google use horizontal scaling; small startups might begin with vertical.

Best practice: design for horizontal scaling from the start, but use vertical scaling for database masters during early growth.

Key Takeaways

1
Vertical Scaling: Upgrade single machine (CPU, memory, disk); simpler but hardware-limited
2
Horizontal Scaling: Add more machines; nearly unlimited scale but more complexity
3
Resilience: Horizontal provides fault tolerance; vertical creates single point of failure
4
Cost Model: Horizontal pay-as-you-grow; vertical requires large upfront capital
5
Best Practice: Design for horizontal from start; use vertical only for databases early-stage
6
Cloud Era: Modern applications assume horizontal scaling; stateless by design

Visual Diagram

Single server -> Multiple servers (horizontal) vs Bigger server (vertical)

Sign in to unlock

Sign In Free